Author: Attorney Desk Reference Manual
Last updated: February 2008
Statute, Jurisdiction and Venue
Annulment
Legal Separation
Bigamy
Common-Law Marriage
Dissolution/Divorce
Statute
Overview
Residency Requirements
Grounds
Procedure
Joint Simplified Dissolution of Marriage
Relief Available
Maintenance
Factors Considered
Modification
Enforcement
Property
Marital Debts
Marital Residence
Pension Assets
Bankruptcy
Child Support
Amount
Enforcement
Modification
Termination
Custody
Jurisdiction
Standard
Standing
Joint Custody
Factors Considered
Custody Modification
Removal of Children from State
Visitation
Supervised Visitation
Grandparents
Visitation Modification
Enforcement
Back to Family Law Table of Contents
Back to Attorney Desk Reference Manual Table of Contents
An Illinois court has subject matter jurisdiction to enter a judgment of dissolution of marriage if either party has maintained Illinois residency for 90 days by the date of judgment. There is no pre-filing waiting period. 750 ILCS 5/401.
Proceedings shall take place in the county where either party resides. Venue is not jurisdictional and any objection must be made within the time for the respondent to respond. 750 ILCS 5/104.
Within certain constraints, a marriage can be annulled within certain specified time periods. As discussed below, even though a marriage is declared to be invalid, some of the consequences of marriage continue.
The reasons to declare a marriage invalid include:
1. A person lacked the capacity to consent at the time of the marriage ceremony for one of the following reasons:
2. A party lacks the physical capacity to consummate the marriage by sexual intercourse and the other party did not know of the incapacity at the time of the marriage ceremony.
3. A party was age 16 or 17 and did not have parental or guardian consent or judicial approval.
4. The marriage is prohibited under 5/301(4) or 5/212(a)(1) – (4):
The following are able to seek annulment:
The time limits for filing for annulment are as follows:
The following are limitations on the invalidity of the marriage:
The following rules apply to legal separation:
Three elements are required to be a putative spouse:
A putative spouse acquires the same legal rights as a legal spouse, including maintenance, even if the marriage is prohibited by 750 ILCS 5/212, or invalidated by 750 ILCS 5/301 (5/702).
The status of putative spouse is eliminated by the knowledge of the fact that (s)he is not legally married, and no further acquisition of spousal rights is permitted.
If there is a legal spouse, or another putative spouse, the rights acquired by the putative spouse do not supersede the rights of the legal spouse, or other putative spouse. The court will apportion property, maintenance and support rights as appropriate in the interests of justice.
A common-law marriage is not valid in Illinois if entered into after June 30, 1905. If a marriage is valid in the state in which it was entered, it will be valid here, unless the marriage was intended to circumvent Illinois law.
Under the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, a person who meets certain requirements can cause the marriage to be dissolved. There are grounds for dissolution that are based upon fault or upon irreconcilable differences between the parties. In addition, under certain circumstances parties wishing to divorce can take advantage of the joint simplified dissolution procedure.
One spouse must be a resident in Illinois for 90 days preceding a finding of dissolution of the marriage (5/401(a)). Thus, you can file for dissolution before you have lived in Illinois for 90 days. Residency meets the jurisdictional requirements for a judgment of dissolution, and personal jurisdiction over the other party is not required.
The following are grounds for dissolution of marriage:
No Fault dissolution can occur in two instances:
A dissolution proceeding is commenced by filing a petition for dissolution of marriage or a praecipe for summons in which a petition must be filed within six months (5/411(a)).
The petition must set forth at a minimum the following information (5/403(a)(1) – (6)):
The court at the request of either party or on its own discretion can order conciliation (5/404(a)).
Both parties must appear, and:
To file for the Joint Simplified Dissolution of Marriage:
To get temporary relief:
Either the service of a summons and petition or praecipe operates to stay against both parties and their agents until judgment is entered, the case dismissed or further order the following:
A party needs personal jurisdiction to enforce a dissolution action stay.
The court needs personal jurisdiction to order maintenance.
The court has discretion to order temporary or permanent maintenance to either spouse without regard to marital misconduct in an amount that takes into account a number of factors including the following:
As a practical matter most courts only award rehabilitative (time limited) maintenance in long term marriages.
Standard: To modify a judgment, the party must show a substantial change in circumstances (5/510(a)).
Notice: Modification is effective only upon installments accruing after notice to other party (5/510(a)).
Cessation: Unless otherwise agreed upon and incorporated into the judgment, an obligation to pay maintenance ceases upon the death of either party or the remarriage of the party receiving maintenance or if the party receiving maintenance cohabits with another person on a conjugal basis (5/510(c)).
Procedure (In State): File a petition to modify maintenance in the judicial district where such judgment was entered with notice or summons to the respondent. If neither party remains in the judicial district, file in the district where the recipient of such support resides (5/511(a)). If payment is made to the clerk and neither party continues to reside in the judicial district, either party or the court itself can transfer collection to the clerk of the court in the other county (5/511(d)).
Procedure (Out of State): A modification action is commenced by filing a petition to enroll the judgment of the other state, attaching a copy of the judgment to the petition and providing notice of the filing to the clerk of the court where the judgment was entered or last modified (5/511(c)).
The following rules rules apply to enforcement of maintenance;
All property acquired during the marriage is presumed to be marital property. Marital property is subject to a fair but not necessarily equal distribution, without regard to marital misconduct.
Non-marital property is not subject to distribution. 5/503 defines non-marital property to include the following categories:
Debts from the marriage are subject to equitable division. Third-party creditors are not bound by the judgment and may still pursue either spouse.
The court considers the needs of the children, the needs of the custodial parent, and contribution of the parties to the acquisition and maintenance of the home.
In determining the division of marital property, the court is required under 5/503(d) to consider the desirability of awarding the family home, or the right to live in the home for reasonable periods, to the spouse having custody of the children.
Pensions acquired by either spouse after the marriage and before a judgment of dissolution is entered are presumed to be marital property. Each client should make sure the judgment specifies who is to draw up and pay for the QDRO (Qualified Domestic Relations Order) dividing this asset, or refuse to sign the judgment until the QDRO is done, since drafting a QDRO involves additional fees.
If either party anticipates filing for bankruptcy, both should file jointly before filing for dissolution. Otherwise, one party could file post-decree and leave the other responsible for marital debts. Maintenance and support are not dischargeable.
The court determines the minimum amount of child support that a non-custodial spouse is required to pay. The statute establishes the following guidelines, based on the net income of the non-custodial parent:
|
# OF CHILDREN |
% OF NET INCOME |
|
1 |
20 |
|
2 |
28 |
|
3 |
32 |
|
4 |
40 |
|
5 |
45 |
|
6 or more |
50 |
The court shall apply statutory guidelines unless the court makes a finding that application of the guidelines would be inappropriate after considering the best interests of the child in light of evidence that includes, but is not limited to, a number of stated factors:
Net income is income from all sources (including second jobs, overtime, holiday pay, etc.) minus the following deductions:
Federal benefits based on remuneration for employment, including Social Security Disability Insurance, are subject to withholding to enforce child support orders. 42 USC §659(a). However, section 659 does not apply to SSI, which is a needs-based program. SSI benefits are not assignable or subject to garnishment or other legal process. 42 USC §407(a); 42 USC §1383(d). The Illinois Appellate Court has held that section 407(a) prohibits a state court from ordering a party to pay child support out of an SSI allowance. Lozada v. Rivera, 324 Ill. App.3d 476, 755 N.E.2d 548, 258 Ill. Dec. 165 (2nd Dist. 2001).
The client should do what s/he can to determine a spouse’s source of income. If the spouse has "side jobs" and income is undeclared, it is difficult to get an order of withholding.
There is a rebuttable presumption that the supporting party’s net income for any prior period of time was the same as his or her net income at the time a child support order for current support is entered.
If the net income of the supporting party cannot be ascertained because of default or any other reason, the Court shall order support in an amount considered reasonable in the particular case. This is frequently called “needs based” order. Generally, a needs based order tends to be more than a guideline support order. Therefore, providing accurate pay records is to the supporting parent’s financial benefit.
A party may enforce an existing support order through one of the following methods:
The Department of Health and Human Services will file a claim for any state resident who is seeking support, whether married or unmarried. If the petitioner is collecting cash assistance and the supporting parent is ordered to pay, the payment goes to the state and the recipient gets an extra $50. For the expedited Child Support Hearing procedure, see 750 ILCS 25/7.
UIFSA (Uniform Interstate Family Support Act) has been adopted in Illinois. The Act governs enforcement and modification of child support orders of another state.
An income withholding order from another state may be sent by first class mail to the obligor or employer and shall create obligation without registration or the support order or income withholding order may be registered with the appropriate Illinois tribunal. The procedure for registration is found at 750 ILCS 22/602.
A court may modify support where there is a substantial change in the circumstances of the parties or needs of the children.
Note: Where a client cannot pay support due to unemployment or a reduction in income, the client should seek modification. Otherwise, the support obligation continues.
Support terminates upon emancipation of the child unless otherwise specified. A support obligation does not terminate upon the death of the supporting parent, although a claim must be filed against the estate of the decedent.
Under 750 ILCS 5/513, the court may order post-majority payments where a child is disabled or incurring educational expenses.
Note: The Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), enacted with an effective date of January 1, 2004, repealed the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA).
For a detailed discussion of the differences between the UCCJA and the UCCJEA click on the title below:
Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA)
To view a video training on the UCCJEA and the differences between the UCCJA and the UCCJEA click on the title below:
How to Utilize the Uniform Child Custody and Enforcement Act
Custody is governed by 750 ILCS 36/101 et seq., the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA).
750 ILCS 36/101 et seq.
Under the Illinois UCCJEA, Illinois courts have jurisdiction to originally determine custody (including visitation) if:
No other state would have jurisdiction under any of the above bases.
Note: Under the UCCJEA home state jurisdiction is the jurisdictional basis of top priority. This is in contrast to the UCCJA which did not assign priority to any of the four bases.
The above factors may be determined in a phone conference by judges in the different jurisdictions.
An Illinois court shall not take jurisdiction of a custody matter for purposes of modifying a custody determination made by a court of another state if there is a custody proceeding pending in another state exercising jurisdiction under the UCCJEA. This is true unless the Illinois court has jurisdiction to make an initial custody determination and the court of the other state determines that the Illinois court may assume jurisdiction or the court of the other state or the Illinois court determines that neither the child nor the child's parents presently reside in the other state.
An Illinois court that is informed of a pending custody proceeding in another state that has jurisdiction under the UCCJEA during the course of an Illinois custody proceeding shall stay the Illinois proceeding and communicate with the court in the other state. If the court of the other state does not determine that Illinois is the more appropriate forum, the Illinois court must dismiss the custody proceeding.
An Illinois court may enforce a custody determination made by a court of another state that has jurisdiction under the UCCJEA if after communicating with the court of that state, it authorizes such enforcement. Enforcement of a custody order proceeds on an expedited basis much like a habeas corpus proceeding.
A child custody proceeding can be brought by a parent or a person other than the parent if the child is not in the physical custody of the parent. 750 ILCS 5/601(b).
A person other than the natural parent who seeks custody based upon having "physical custody" has to show more than mere possession of the child.
"Physical custody" has been defined by the Illinois Supreme Court to mean that the parent has "voluntarily and indefinitely relinquished custody" of his or her child. In re Petition of Kirchner, 164 Ill.2d 468, 491, 649 N.E.2d 324, 334, 208 Ill. Dec. 268, 278, (1995), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1152, 115 S. Ct. 2599, 132 L. Ed. 2d 846 (1995); overruled in part on other grounds by Timmons ex rel. R.L.S. v. L.S. (In re R.L.S.), 218 Ill. 2d 428, 844 N.E.2d 22, 300 Ill. Dec. 350 (2006).
Joint custody requires that parents be able to cooperate "effectively and consistently" in matters relating to joint parenting. Joint custody requires creation of a "Joint Parenting Agreement."
A child’s time is generally not split equally between the residential and non-residential parent. Parents together determine the child’s educational, health-care, religious training, and other major decisions pursuant to the "Joint Parenting Agreement."
The custodial parent alone determines the child’s educational, health-care, and religious training.
The "best interest of the child" is the sole determining factor used by the court and contains the following considerations:
The court shall not consider the conduct of a present or proposed custodian, if such conduct does not affect his/her relationship with the child.
Some practical matters include:
Temporary custody is awarded by the same standards as permanent. The final custody hearing should be de novo, but some judges tend to make their temporary order permanent unless good cause for a change is shown. The client should get temporary custody as soon as possible in proceedings.
A guardian ad litem (GAL) may be appointed for children. The parents pay for the GAL.
Custody fights generally cost thousands of dollars. Experts are brought in, and all parties’ lives are examined.
See Child Abduction
Unless stipulated by the parties:
The standard of proof is clear and convincing evidence.
Custody must be modified in the state where the original judgment was entered unless that state no longer has jurisdiction or has declined jurisdiction and another state currently has jurisdiction, under 28 USCS 1738(A)(f) (see Jurisdiction, above).
The court may approve removal from the state if the move is in the child’s best interests. The burden of proof that removal is in best interests is on the party seeking to remove. Relevant considerations to determine best interest (In Re Marriage of Eckert, 119 Ill. 2d 316, 518 N.E.2d 1041 (1988)) include the following:
The following rules apply to parents' rights:
A parent has an obligation to foster the relationship between the child and ex-spouse. This obligation may be taken into consideration in the award of child custody.
The burden of proof falls upon the custodial parent to show that unsupervised visitation would pose a "serious endangerment of the child’s physical, mental, moral, or emotional health." Courts are reluctant to impose supervised visitation.
Currently, a grand-parent, great-grandparent or sibling may only petition a Court for visitation if there is an "unreasonable denial of visitation." The relative must then satisfy one of the following conditions:
If the above conditions are met the court must still consider a list of 11 factors relevant to the interests of the child and the type of relationship between the child and the relative.
The burden is on the party filing a petition under this Section, as according to Illinois Supreme Court precedent a parent's decision in this fundamental rearing issue is presumed to be proper.
A parent shall not have visitation rights if convicted of any offense involving an illegal sex act perpetrated upon a victim less than 18 years of age while incarcerated, on parole, or a mandatory supervised release program and thereafter, until that person completes a treatment program approved by the court (5/607(e)).
Visitation can be modified at any time if it serves the best interest of the child.
Violation of a visitation order can be enforced by filing a petition for rule to show cause why the offending party should not be held in contempt.
In addition, there is available an expedited procedure in the case of visitation abuse. Visitation abuse occurs when a party has willfully and without justification either:
If the court finds that visitation abuse has occurred, it may order one or more of the following:
The court shall award attorneys fees and costs if it finds that the enforcement action is vexatious and constitutes harassment (5/607.1(g)).
Visitation Interference is when a party "detain(s) or conceal(s) a child with the intent to deprive another of his or her rights to visitation." The police can criminally enforce against unlawful visitation interference under the provisions of 720 ILCS 5/10-5.5. Unlawful Visitation Interference is a petty offense. Violation of a court order establishing visitation rights is required before a complaint may be filed.
Back to Top
Back to Family Law Table of Contents
Back to Attorney Desk Reference Manual Table of Contents
Printed from: www.illinoisprobono.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.dsp_Content&contentID=307
We welcome your comments and suggestions